Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Landaluce vs Peter Gojowczyk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Landaluce vs Gojowczyk analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Landaluce vs Peter Gojowczyk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Landaluce has won 49.17% of points on his second serve, while Gojowczyk has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Landaluce, in recent form, has won 52.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gojowczyk has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.63% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Landaluce has saved 61.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gojowczyk has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Landaluce has won 55.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 26), with Gojowczyk winning 58.82% (W/L 20/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Landaluce has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gojowczyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 207/ 147), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 113/ 128).
- Player level: In the last year, Landaluce has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 22/ 11), where as Gojowczyk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Landaluce winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 2 and Gojowczyk winning 1. The last match between Landaluce and Gojowczyk was at the Mallorca Challenger, 30-08-2023, First, Hard with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 3-6 6-4 7-6(9).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Landaluce and Gojowczyk have played a deciding set 1 times, with Landaluce winning 1 times and Gojowczyk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Landaluce winning 1, and Gojowczyk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Landaluce has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.49 while Gojowczyk has played against players with an average rank of 329.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Landaluce has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gojowczyk has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Landaluce has converted 46.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gojowczyk has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Landaluce 1 - 0 Gojowczyk
323
Rank
317
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
456
Rank
39
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
50% (39-39)
Career Total W/L
55% (532-441)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$34,500
Career Prize Money
$1,837,855
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Martin Landaluce | Peter Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:14 | 2:36:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (78/110) | 60% (71/118) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (57/78) | 75% (53/71) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (15/32) | 47% (22/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (43/118) | 35% (38/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 7-6(9) |
Stats 
Martin Landaluce
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
118)
10
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
53 of
71)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
118)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Landaluce | Peter Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (32/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/242) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 71 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 395.91 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1044/1707) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (709/1044) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (326/663) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (80/177) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (686/1659) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Calvin Hemery
61%
(
76 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
10
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Martin Landaluce
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Martin Landaluce
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Gojowczyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Akira Santillan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Landaluce Vs Gojowczyk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
